Solutions

Brand Tracking

Manage, track, and grow your brand with always-on, actionable insights.

Marketing Mix Modelling

Monitor and optimise the long and short-term effects of your marketing efforts.

Campaign Evaluation

Measure and track your campaign’s performance before, after, and as it happens.

Blog Posts
Back

Consumer journeys become more and more complex

May 26, 2017

Robert Beatus


Share this article:


And changes in behavior happen faster than ever. Consumers learn about products, compare prices, share opinions, consume content, and make their decisions where and when it best serves them on their consumer journey – their path to purchase. Different websites, devices, store channels and media types (both online and offline) interact to impact consumers throughout their journey. This forms the consumer experience that is ultimately decisive for the success or failure for brands and retailers.

To make things even more complex, consumers’ paths to purchase are highly different for different consumer segments, purchase channels and shopper missions. Most CPG (Consumer Packaged Goods) giants and top retailers agree with the importance of an omnichannel perspective on the consumer experience. However, most of them have yet to move beyond single-channel tactics.

The gap between online and offline shopper insights

There is one big challenge that companies who do not choose to move into an omnichannel perspective face. It is the lack of easy-to-implement and robust research methods to ultimately measure consumers’ omnichannel paths to purchase. Which online and offline touchpoints should be prioritized for brand building and ultimately conversion? Currently, most CPG companies have a good understanding of how their shoppers are behaving; both online and offline. However, this understanding often does not link the online and the offline world together. It also does not link how shoppers are interacting and behaving across the entire Path to Purchase.

READ ALSO: Benefits of Path to Purchase analysis

There are several reasons why marketing research methods are not able to uncover the omnichannel path to purchase.

Let’s go through the most common approaches:

1. Self-stated surveys, after completed purchase

The most traditional way of researching path to purchase is asking consumers about their Path to Purchase, the touchpoints they’ve encountered leading up to purchase, and the impact they’ve had on them. This method allows for mapping of typical Paths to Purchase, including all types of touchpoints. However, it is difficult for people to simply tell which specific touchpoints made them take a specific action. Thus, this method gives very limited insight into the impact of different touchpoints.

2. Monitor consumers’ digital behavior

This method has a higher validity since it’s based on actual behavior. However, it only links to online behavior not capturing the interaction between online and offline interactions, missing the central omnichannel aspect of path to purchase. Moreover, in general companies do not have access to online purchase data from different e-retailers, making conversions impossible to capture. Another consideration for this approach is that it generates a TON of data – so be sure to probe an agency on their data engineering and data science chops.

READ ALSO: Brand research: What is it & why is it important?

3. Qualitative research

Focus groups, online diaries, or in-depth interviews enable research to dig deeper into consumers reasoning and motives behind behaviors. Qualitative methods are therefore widely used to understand Path to Purchase. The main problem with using a qualitative approach is that it does not quantify either your finding or measure the impact of individual touchpoints.

4. Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM):

In this method, advanced statistical modeling is applied on historical data on media spend and sales. Marketing Mix Modeling does not rely on surveys, and as such is free from any research biases. It also allows for understanding the impact of individual touchpoints which guides media planning. However, MMM requires high quality time series data of all relevant media spend and sales. This is difficult for media owners to get a hold of.

Further, relying on historical media spend, MMM can only assess the media channels used by the advertiser historically, not revealing anything about the potential of new media channels, nor touchpoints that can’t be quantified by media spend (e.g. recommendations from friends, or key category influencers). Moreover, interactions between and sequences of touchpoints are very difficult to capture with MMM.

Do you recognize the challenges above?

I understand if it’s hard to find a research methodology to capture Path to Purchase across channels. Please share how you have solved this situation by writing in the comments section. Otherwise, you’re most welcome to get in touch with me to discuss this subject.

What methods does your company use to understand Path to Purchase?

Nepa´s approach to map consumers’ omnichannel Path to Purchase is to use both monitored and self-stated data. We do this by collecting individual single source data (both attitudinal and behavioral) through a focused panel of respondents for a limited time period (via web scraping, browser monitoring, app monitoring, and a self-reporting portal).

This way we can capture all touchpoints that consumers interact with, as well as their actions (e.g. makes a store visit or purchase) not limited to bought media or owned channels. By modeling this data, we help our clients understand the impact of individual touchpoints and the combinations of them. As a bonus, we use trigger-based surveys to capture motivations behind actions and experiences of touchpoints. The output allows for:

  1. Optimizing marketing budget.
  2. Informing campaigns and content strategies.
  3. Informing retailer-specific insights. All insights are omnichannel context, and are not limited to bought media touchpoints.

“The output gives our clients an actionable framework to make market-by-market decisions about how to focus their media, marketing, and sales investments along the Path to Purchase.”

I help businesses to thrive with customer-centricity by utilizing the power of continuous consumer insights. There is no end to what you can achieve with real-time consumer insights, customer feedback, and footprints. Do you want to know more about our approach or share your view on these challenges? You’re most welcome to get in touch with us. 

Robert Beatus
Head of R&D at Nepa

Blog Posts
Back

Get full return on your marketing investments

May 01, 2017

Sam Richardson


Share this article:


Make continuous use of marketing insights

Today ROI on marketing investments is top of mind for senior executives across every industry – globally. As the adoption of Marketing Mix Modeling and marketing ROI measurement evolves, so does the need for commercial effectiveness. Companies expect increased continuity, much more detailed data granularity and complete holistic reporting. Therefore, having the ability of extracting relevant data, quickly turning it into actionable insights that will have an immediate impact. That is as long as they are distributed to those who are able to put the insights into immediate use.

What is Marketing Mix Modeling?

To summarize, Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM) is an econometric method (quantitative techniques for making relevant economic business decisions). Therefore, it gives insight in to how different marketing and media channel investments influence business performance. For example, what activities deliver returns on sales and what do not.

READ ALSO: Optimise your marketing budget with Marketing Mix Modeling

What outcome can you expect?

Applying an MMM-tool will drive a high level of improvements in your marketing effectiveness; with fact-based ROI optimization to marketing and media investments. So, no matter what MMM provider you turn to, it is generally is on:

  • Increased revenue
  • How marketing and media investments drive traffic to stores or websites
  • Increased profit level
  • Increased number of transactions/usage of a service

So, the findings are typically used to inform and verify decision making related to marketing budget and allocation between different marketing channels.

Nepa MMM focus on much more than increasing sales

Nepa conducts MMM reviews, for a large number of industries and countries, for a wide array of products and services. Specifically, this can range from consumer packaged goods (CPG) to financial or subscription services for clients operating in and out of the digital world.

In addition, most providers that offer MMM services focus only on the relation between marketing investments and sales effect. However, Nepa offers a broader scope. We apply our advanced skills in data science, innovative analytics, and leading experience in brand tracking.

READ ALSO: Benefits of Path to Purchase analysis

1. We measure the impact of marketing in social media

Unlike in other types of media, it has previously been impossible to measure the impact of marketing and media investments in the rapidly growing social media channel. Nepa has signed a unique and global agreement with Facebook in Palo Alto. We were chosen as one of the first companies globally to become partners with Facebook in the “Facebook MMM Partner Program”.

By having a direct digital connection, tapping into very granular data within every marketing campaign, with every company on the planet that run on Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and Audience Network, we can help buyers of media to spend much smarter in our rapidly changing media landscape that most others can’t. Some implications of this is:

You get better insights on the role of digital domain in the entire media mix

Detailed digital data (social media data) provides improved precision in analysis models that allow us to see the effects of media; unless this granularity of data is available.

You get better insights on how to optimize within the digital domain

Detailed digital data provides perfect understanding of the effects of advertising in social media, with the determination of for example, ROI for different:

  • campaign periods and ads
  • units (Desktop, Mobile)
  • platforms (Facebook, Instagram…)
  • ad placings (Newsfeed, RHS)
  • ads targeting different groups

It also enables detailed regional models for advertisers, with the determination of:

  • Differences in ROI for different countries and regions

2. We manage both short and long term marketing effectiveness

Nepa is the leading brand tracking supplier in the Nordics; following over 150 brand categories. We have extensive experience in understanding the importance of generating brand effects and its implication on long term sales. When conducting MMM projects with Nepa, you get a nuanced perspective of the brand versus the sales drivers.

In our projects, there has been a significant difference from the ones helping to drive sales in the upcoming years. By considering the holistic perspective of the medias effect of driving the business; a much different media mix is often optimal compared to the optimal media mix optimizing short term sales.

Want to know more about the Nepa approach to MMM?

Nepa’s approach offers state of the art statistical and mathematical skills. So, to set up and operate a comprehensive Marketing Mix Modeling program, you need to:

  • establish clear objectives
  • decide on how your organization intends to use the results

For example, how will the learning be disseminated throughout your organization to obtain continuous improvement and to improve strategic planning?

In conclusion, the knowledge you have of your business combined with Nepa’s experience in econometric modeling and our approach to Marketing Mix Modeling is important. Hence, it will enable us to identify a sustained approach to marketing activity planning that delivers long-term sales growth and improved profitability.

READ ALSO: What is brand tracking and why is it important?

We promise to help you get in-depth answers to business questions like:

  • What is the optimal spend and mix of marketing investments to achieve financial objectives?
  • What is the optimal total media spend and how should you mix the media?
  • How to optimize investments to drive sales and profit by customer segment?
  • What is the ROI for all your marketing activities and what type of content is most effective?
  • How much is marketing activities contributing to relevant brand KPIs?
  • How to balance investments in brand building vs. product focused marketing?
  • What would be the future impact of a change in the marketing strategy and budget?
  • How does marketing perform in-season vs. out of season? What is the optimal timing and execution?
  • How to optimize the value of a loyalty program?
  • What is the optimal sequence of activities to drive customer behavior (next best action)?
  • How does marketing effectiveness vary by media channel and geography?
  • How to take advantage of media synergies? What is the role of paid, earned and owned media?

To hear more about our holistic ROI-approach and your opportunities to sharpen the data-driven decision making, let´s book a 1:1 meeting!

Andreas Nordfors
Product Director at Nepa

Blog Posts
Back

Insights from “The superpowers of data science and analytics”

April 22, 2017

Sam Richardson


Share this article:


Using the right data for the right purpose

Earlier this month, Nepa https://nepa.com/had the good fortune of attending the Marketing Analytics and Data Science Conference in San Francisco (April 3-5), an annual rite of passage for marketers who are already sold or hoping to be sold on – as the conference itself boasts – the “superpowers of data science and analytics.”

As a proud benefactor of these superpowers, the tone of the conference was both familiar and validating, especially as Nepa strives to create value for its clients at the intersection of big data and data-drive consumer insights.

The conference was chaired by David Boyle, Executive VP of BBC Worldwide, and featured esteemed speakers from Academia (Harvard, Carnegie Mellon), a variety of verticals (Netflix, Politico, AMEX, Schwan Food Company) and – as San Francisco is among the most popular cities for new businesses – the start-up community (Sam Yagan, Bloomberg Beta).

Nepa, of course, took copious notes throughout MADS17, so it’s our pleasure to now reveal some of the bigger takeaways from the conference:

Prepare and then ask the right questions

  • Alistair Croll, of Harvard Business School, spoke eloquently about how marketers once asked a question before they acquired data to (hopefully) answer it. The new answer is not to build a machine prepared for all questions, but to build a data infrastructure by answering all known questions the business has.
  • Or, as Bill Franks, CTO of Teradata, succinctly put it in 2012: “To succeed with big data, start small.” Croll also shared research from Microsoft researcher Cormac Herley about the infamous Nigerian prince email scam, which we’re certain no attendees ever fell for. What everyone wants to know is why anyone would fall for it, when it’s proffered with such ridiculously unintelligible language. Sure, if the English were at all coherent, click rates would improve, but as recipients got closer to making a transaction, they would realize the scam and, have wasted the time of the crooks. The implausible story, by design, only attracts the most gullible people, those most willing to see it through for the entire scheme.

The lesson is to never tacitly accept the metrics. We see this in the focus on CPM for ad sales or focus on channel sales at omni-channel retailers, question everything so your efforts are achieving maximum impact.

READ ALSO: Optimise your marketing budget with Marketing Mix Modeling

AI and Big Data are not always correct. In fact, often they’re way off.

  • Susan Etlinger, an analyst at Altimeter Group, shared some wisdom from the audience on the topic of algorithmic bias. At its core, this means the inputs into algorithms can contain bias that then have unfortunate results in the output. An example of this comes in the literary world: A database of prose will have predictive models believing there are many more black sheep than white sheep because the former are discussed more in literature, even though they’re significantly rarer in reality. Those living in rural areas know what we’re talking about.

Lesson here: Be mindful of the data sources used and their potential biases. Side note here – with speakers from BBC, Politico, Civis Analytics, and more – there was no lack of chatter about the 2016 election – where there were many biases in data that led to flawed prediction models.

Optimizing without customer experience is dangerous.

  • Nepa embraces the power of data science and analytics, but get concerned when the focus is too much about operational efficiency. David Rogier, founder of MasterClass, shared an example from Tesco where the grocery chain was able to optimize a store so efficiently that it could run with four employees per shift compared to the usual 30 plus for the same sized store. They achieved this largely by having only self-checkout options and laying out the store for fastest restocking. The problem was that, over time, there were no customers!

But why? As Nepa has learned using experience data, reducing the cost of labor, lowering inventory and driving more efficient use of space can improve operational performance, but it will take its toll on sales and traffic if drivers of customer experience are not accounted for.

Presentation and education matter.

  • Rebecca Haller, Director of Audience Insights at POLITICO, shared some words of wisdom learned from her early writing days: “Journalists don’t ride the bus enough.” It’s a nice way of saying reporters are out of touch with the people they’re serving.
  • Josh Hendler, CTO of Purpose, shared that when he was working with field teams he didn’t really need more data analysts, only those who could educate people on the available tools and how to use them.

These two points are very applicable to the research and analytics industry, where insights are organized and curated with headquarters or the c-suite in mind, not the people on the front lines that can act on them.

READ ALSO: Benefits of Path to Purchase analysis

And, to wrap

I think one of the key themes about data science and marketing analytics was on display in a presentation delivered by Haile Owusu, Chief Data Scientist at Mashable. When it comes to data there are “haves” and “have nots” – i.e. companies that have first party data (retailers, OTT apps, etc.) and those that don’t (CPGs, content creators, etc.). For the “haves” – this can be used to significant competitive advantage (e.g. Facebook, Amazon, Walmart, etc.) – though, unfortunately, many companies do not take advantage of this opportunity (omni-channel retailers come to mind).

For the “have nots” – Haile Owusu reminded us that not all hope is lost – his team uses data fusion and robust analytics – to predict which pieces of content will go viral and where. These insights help them to optimize their investments to support the content with greatest potential. Through advancements in data engineering and data science fields, the data “have nots” are able to bridge data sources and use them for market advantage.

Thanks to Knect365, David Boyle, the presenters, and attendees. “MADS17” was a great conference and we look forward to MADS18. Hope to see you there.

What about Nepa?

If you’re not keen on spending valuable time refining methodologies, sitting behind one-way mirrors, and waiting on crosstabs, all before it’s all analyzed into insights with fleeting impact, then Nepa is someone to speak to.

Sean Dunn
Vice President, Client Solutions at Nepa USA

Blog Posts
Back

Transform data into insights – boost your innovation capabilities

March 19, 2017

Sam Richardson


Share this article:


Generate the insights that are relevant to you

I get a lot of questions on how to handle all data (or Big Data) and particularly how to use the insights for something that creates business value. Not only in the distant future but here and now.

Very often I sense great frustration and nervousness related to this question. I have previously identified 5 crucial steps to develop a customer feedback system to drive innovation. There is definitely reason to delve deeper into these steps. Let´s start with the first one:

“Understand the difference between data and consumer insights”

I would say that all of us know that we have a lot of data. We also know that we could benefit from using it more often and more targeted. Most of us also know that it’s one of many requirements of future business success. The problem is that for many managers the task feels unsurpassable.

Questions in abundance stacks up:

  1. Where should I start?
  2. Whom should I listen to?
  3. What platforms do I use?
  4. What BI tool should be employed?
  5. Should I have a cloud solution etc, etc?

The more questions you try to answer, the more questions pop up.

A popular response is to do something because it’s better to do something than nothing, right? Well, maybe… but you don’t delve into the technical issues until you have a clear understanding of what you want to achieve – that there are infinite possibilities as to what you can do, but a lot less that you should do.

READ ALSO: Benefits of Path to Purchase analysis

How can business leaders transform big data into something resembling insights?

In today’s world of information technology and exploding social media interaction, data is abundant. According to IBM we create 2.5 quintillion bytes of data (that is a lot of zeros, in fact it’s 2 500 000 000 000 000 000 if you were to write it out in numbers, or 1018) per DAY. (https://www-01.ibm.com/software/data/bigdata/what-is-big-data.html)

“We create 2.5 quintillion bytes of data per day”

This is so much that 90% of the data in the world today has been created in the last two years alone. That’s BIG DATA … and if you think that the amount of data will decrease, think again. With IoT and 5G, this is just the beginning.

Only convert data into insights your business can use

In that abundant wealth of data, an overall problem is that there are even more insights than data points that can be harvested. I would argue that the number of insights available is already on the brink of infinity. The trick is to generate the insights that are relevant to you, your business and your market – today and in the future.

A mistake many data scientists and analysts make, is to try to solve many problems at once. Having the skills and finding the ultimate machine that can answer everything, every time, everywhere is like finding a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. It just can’t be done. What you must do is to focus and to quickly convert data into insights your business can use. I have successfully used a use case approach to reach those goals.

A use case helps you solve a specific business question by using data and technology solutions. A good use case provides insights that are relevant and on time to the relevant stakeholders to support them in their decision making.

READ ALSO: Get to know your customers with brand health tracking

This is the playbook I use: A use case approach in 8 steps

  1. Identify business driven use cases, questions or challenges that business managers need to handle now and in the near future. In terms of innovation, identify which parts of the innovation process that needs insights – what, when, and why decisions that need to be supported. Is it innovation or is it about product development?
  2. Get your business people to prioritize between use cases from a business perspective, i.e. which use cases will give the most significant impact on your business?
  3. Understand what data is available and where. It is a simple enough statement, but a task that can be daunting. Often there are many different sources such as data warehouses, providers, etc. If the task feels overwhelming, let the prioritized use cases guide you to what data should be investigated.
  4. Do a feasibility analysis, i.e. soberly evaluate resources (time, money, etc.) needed to solve each use case. Don’t go into details yet, do a high-level analysis.
  5. Create a priority matrix – map business value versus implementation cost. It´s not uncommon for a second or third priority, from a business perspective, to be the first use case that makes sense to implement based on a trade-off between feasibility and business value.
  6. Create a roadmap based on the priority matrix.
  7. Build the first use case solution, start with a MVP (Minimum viable product). A MVP:
    1. has enough value that people can understand, use, and buy in
    2. demonstrates enough future benefit to retain early adopters
    3. provides a feedback loop to guide future development
  8. Show business value to get traction within your organisation, then move on to next use case, show business value, iterate, iterate, iterate…

READ ALSO:  The brand metrics that actually matter

Never underestimate the need for communication – learn from a Nobel prize winner

A word of caution: As data driven, logical, and analytical people we tend to think that data is king; in some sense, that’s true. But a human mind works differently. As Nobel prize winner Kahneman (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking,_Fast_and_Slow) identified, we use two different modes of thought:

  1. System 1, which is fast, instinctive and emotional (The Hare)
  2. System 2, which is slower, more deliberative, and more logical (The Tortoise)

Research has shown that the Hare is a lot more dominant than the Tortoise in human decision making. That is why humans (and yes, managers are humans) are very reluctant to believe insights that contradicts their gut feeling. That’s why it’s important to include hypothesis sessions, i.e. what do the managers believe the data will tell them, when working with customer insights in general, and with Big Data specifically. Because, when you know the Hare, it’s easier to be the Tortoise.

Furthermore, you need to set up a structure with communication plans, steering groups, and all that management mumbo jumbo. In the end, if you don’t get the HiPPO (Highest Paid Person’s Opinion) to sponsor you, then you will be another frustrated fish swimming around in the Data lake.

Even though this post only touches on surface of all the implications of turning data into insights, I hope it has helped you navigate in the choppy waters of Data Lakes and Big Data. If you have any questions or comments, please don’t hesitate to contact me.

Erik Enecker
Chief Product Officer at Nepa USA & COO Global Product at Nepa

Blog Posts
Back

Omnichannel Perspective on Path to Purchase

February 23, 2017

Robert Beatus


Share this article:


Consumer journeys become more and more complex

and changes happen faster than ever. Consumers learn about products, compare prices, share opinions, consume content, and make their decisions where and when it best serves them on their path to purchase.

Different websites, devices, store channels and media types (both online and offline) interacts and impact consumers throughout their journey. This forms the consumer experience that is ultimately decisive for the success or failure for brands and retailers. To make things even more complex, consumers paths to purchase are highly different for different consumer segments; purchase channels and shopper missions. Most CPG (Consumer Packaged Goods) giants and top retailers agree with the importance of an omnichannel perspective on the consumer experience. However, most of them have yet to move beyond single-channel tactics.

READ ALSO: Benefits of Path to Purchase analysis

The gap between online and offline shopper insights

There is one big challenge that companies who do not choose to move into an omnichannel perspective face. It is the lack of easy to implement and robust research methods to ultimately measure consumers’ omnichannel paths to purchase. Which online and offline touchpoints should be prioritized for brand building and ultimately conversion? Currently, most CPG companies have a good understanding of how their shoppers are behaving; both online and offline. However, this understanding often does not link the online world to the offline world together. It also does not link how shoppers are interacting and behaving across the entire Path to Purchase.

There are several reasons why marketing research methods are not able to uncover the omnichannel paths to purchase.

Let’s go through the most common approaches:

  1. Self-stated surveys: The most traditional way of researching path to purchase is asking consumers about their Path to Purchase, the touchpoints they encounter, and the impact they’ve had on them. This method allows for mapping of typical Paths to Purchase, including all types of touchpoints. However, it is typically difficult for people to simply tell which specific touchpoints made them take a specific action. As a result, this method gives very limited insight into the impact of different touchpoints.
  2. Monitor consumers’ digital behavior: This method has a higher validity since it’s based on actual behavior. However, it only links to online behavior not capturing the interaction between online and offline interactions; which is the central aspect of omnichannel paths to purchase. Moreover, companies do not have access to online purchase data from different e-retailers which is why conversions cannot be captured.
  3. Qualitative research: Focus groups, online diaries, or in-depth interviews enable research to dig deeper into consumers reasoning and motives behind behaviors. Qualitative methods are therefore widely used to understand Path to Purchase. The main problem with using a qualitative approach is that it does not quantify either your finding or measure of the impact of individual touchpoints.
  4. Marketing Mix Modelling (MMM): In this method, advanced statistical modeling is applied on historical data on media spend and sales. MMM does not rely on surveys. Therefore it is free from any research biases. It also allows for understanding the impact of individual touchpoints which guides media planning. However, MMM requires high quality time series data of all relevant media spend and sales. This is difficult for media owners to get a hold of. MMM is also limited to the media channels used by the advertiser historically. Moreover, interactions between and sequences of touchpoints are very difficult to capture with MMM.

READ ALSO: Brand research: What is it & why is it important?

Do you recognize the challenges above?

I understand if it’s hard to find a research methodology to capture Path to Purchase across channels. Share how you have solved this situation by writing in the comments section. Otherwise, you’re most welcome to get in touch with me to discuss this subject.

What methods does your company use to understand Path to Purchase?

Nepa’s approach to map consumers’ omnichannel Path to Purchase is to use both monitored and self-stated data. We do this by collecting individual single source data (both attitudinal and behavioral) through a focused panel of respondents for a limited time period (via web scraping, browser monitoring, app monitoring, and a self-reporting portal). This way we can capture all touchpoints that consumers interact with. As well as their actions (e.g. makes a visit or purchase) not limited to bought media or owned channels. By modeling this data, we help our clients understand the impact of individual touchpoints and the combinations of them. As a bonus, we use trigger-based surveys to capture motivations behind actions and experiences of touchpoints.

“The output gives our clients an actionable framework to make market-by-market decisions about how to focus their media, marketing, and sales investments along the Path to Purchase.”

I help businesses to thrive with customer-centricity by utilizing the power of continuous consumer insights. There is no end to what you can achieve with real-time consumer insights, customer feedback, and footprints. Do you want to know more about our approach or share your view on these challenges? You’re most welcome to get in touch with me.

Robert Beatus
Head of R&D at Nepa

Blog Posts
Back

Innovation and the power of consumer insights

February 21, 2017

Sam Richardson


Share this article:


Businesses that thrive are investing in continuous innovation

powered by continuous consumer insights. They don’t sit and wait with the risk of losing ground. As Nokia CEO Stephen Elop tearfully said, after announcing his company’s acquisition by Microsoft, “We didn’t do anything wrong, but somehow, we lost”. It was precisely this lack of action, the failure to innovate, that resulted in the downfall of Nokia. Yet with another mindset and the tools available today to drive business innovation the smart way, there’s no excuse for your business to get left behind.

Today’s consumers tend to change their behavior very often and unexpectedly. That’s why it’s more important now than ever that your business evolves to catch up. You can start by looking for opportunities to innovate based on the 3 (really basic but nevertheless crucial) characteristics.

3 basic characteristics of a true business innovation:

  1. An idea that solves a need in the market in a new way
  2. Meets this need in a way customers are willing to pay for
  3. Can be transformed into a product or service available on the market

READ ALSO: Brand tracking – your most valuable marketing tool

Innovation can be like sawing off your own legs to grow

New innovation hurts. It is often disruptive and can even hurt your business in the short run. It’s a bit like sawing off your own legs in order to grow newer and stronger legs over the course of a few years; and many businesses aren’t willing to take this perceived risk when quarterly earnings are at stake. So what do they do? They wait and hope, and then watch other innovative companies outpacing them gracefully, as they are sprinting ahead with newer, stronger legs.

Take for example Kodak, Blockbuster, and Nokia. Giants of their industries at the time, each of these business once held a powerful opportunity to innovate; but they all failed to take the chance. Kodak had the patent for digital cameras, Blockbuster was given the chance to buy Netflix, and Nokia could have moved into smartphones; but they didn’t act. Why? Because they were afraid. Afraid it would hurt too much, hurt the quarterly earnings, hurt stock options, etc. So someone else did it instead. How did that work out?

READ ALSO: Brand research: What is brand research & why is it important?

5 areas where customer insights will make a big impact on your business

I would say that there is almost no area in your business where you should not let the voice and the footprints of your customers influence why and how you choose to develop things. Here are 5 areas where I currently help our clients develop their business:

  1. Assessment of opportunities
  2. Ideation based on customer insights
  3. Brand development
  4. Concept and offer development (that this article is mostly about)
  5. Marketing and advertising development – where “detail” is king

But let’s get back to talking about innovation. Can big businesses innovate? Of course they can! They have the resources, industry expertise and distribution at their disposal. They just need the right mindset, tools, and the right people.

The 5 pillars of business innovation that every business can use to succeed:

  1. Acquire the right talent and focus on the people in your organization.
  2. Create the right environment. Business managers tend to minimize risk, optimize processes and make changes with extreme caution. Most of them are afraid to fail, ending up by doing nothing, until doing nothing is a bigger risk. That’s a poor environment for innovation.
  3. Be opportunistic. To unleash the innovative power of your business, you must be willing to take risks, go outside of normal processes, and prototype new ideas.
  4. Let go of control; incentivize instead. The only way to do that is to give the entrepreneurs in your organization freer reign. Manage them with incentives and not rules, processes, checks, and balances. Managing innovation in a controlling way will never work because, per definition, real innovation is a high risk venture with many uncertainties. If you manage real innovations like “a normal project”, then you will fail.
  5. Create a system for continuous customer and market feedback to understand the real habits, rituals, and beliefs that will empower your organization (the lifeblood of an innovative business). It’s hard to make your customers change their behavior. Apple and Procter & Gamble, for example, make a point of engaging customers directly to generate new ideas. They develop new products and services based on superior end-user understanding.

READ ALSO: Brand tracking is key to increase brand awareness

5 crucial steps to develop a customer feedback system to drive innovation

To develop a system to generate continuous customer and market feedback, which will drive innovation, you need to ensure a better fit for your products/services and reduce time to market.

  1. Understand the difference between data and customer insights. Behavioral data often gives you tons of information about What, When, Where, and How, but not so much about Why. Customer insights on the other hand is all about the drivers, the motivation, the unmet needs, the concerns, and the wishes; the fuel for your innovation and your marketing and development opportunities.
  2. Gather customer data from multiple channels, including feedback and actual behavior (the footprints of your customers). Use this data to identify needs your innovations can solve… and do this continuously.
  3. Change the way you work with innovation. Apply a much more agile approach. Interact with your customers through the whole process from early ideas to launchable products.
  4. Collect data on your actions as well as your competitors’ actions to learn from successes and failures systematically.
  5. Test and learn, test and learn, test and succeed. There is nothing wrong in failing as long as you learn from your mistakes. This is how the masters of innovation does it.

I help businesses to thrive with innovation by utilizing the power of continuous consumer insights. There is no end to what you can achieve with real-time consumer insights, customer feedback, and footprints. It changes the way your business thinks about innovation and you avoid the risk of becoming another Nokia. In this post I have only scratched the surface. Why not get in touch with me and I promise to let you in more on the secrets and get your organization started.

Erik Enecker
Chief Product Officer at Nepa USA & COO Global Product at Nepa

Blog Posts
Back

Optimising value growth by leveraging your Path to Purchase

February 21, 2017

Karen Chandler


Share this article:


Profitable growth is ever more challenging

Market conditions, increased competition from new channels and providers coupled with changing consumer and shopper expectations and demands makes growth harder than ever to generate.

However, those that are winning are doing so by creating a new understanding of their business and what’s important through combining multiple data sources and aligning their organisation to execute against these “superior” insights across all touchpoints and channels.

The business challenge on the path to purchase

Most consumer focused companies currently understand how their customers are behaving across touch points. However, this understanding often does not link the online world to the offline world. Nor does it join up data sources to identify how consumers, shoppers and customers are interacting and behaving across all channels and touch points, across the entire Path to Purchase.

Many organisations have already established programs/teams/data insights for separate parts of the journey. However, these insights are often created in silos within the business. To truly optimize revenue, we need to understand the end-to-end journey. We also need to understand how this differs for your different target customers, shoppers and consumers.

READ ALSO: Benefits of Path to Purchase analysis

How?

The key is to track all of their engagements, across your business, to understand the entire Path to Purchase. For example:

  • What drives the purchase, spend or engagement decisions?
  • Which are the priority touch points and why – across all channels and including the online and offline worlds?
  • Which ones influence awareness, consideration and actual purchase or sign up?
  • How does this differ by need and occasion/mission?
  • What is the impact on value growth, bottom line and your KPIs?

To clearly evaluate the financial impact to KPIs of each touchpoint, a true “through the line” perspective of key touch points must be a requirement.

Ultimately, the question to be answered is:

Where should you focus your media, marketing and sales investment along the Path to Purchase to optimize growth?

Nepa combines technology and proven methodologies to create an end to end “single source view” of the Path to Purchase. Specifically, we combine attitudinal and behavioral data. Hence, this helps us to understand what customers are doing, thinking, feeling and experiencing at each stage of the journey.

READ ALSO: Optimise your marketing budget with Marketing Mix Modeling

So, our multiple methodologies can be combined to create the most relevant and tailored solution to your specific business requirements. These methodologies enable us to create an understanding of customers in a broad spectrum. This includes the where, when, why and how customers, consumers and shoppers are engaging for ALL online touch points.

Most importantly, we identify which touch points are the priority ones for driving:

  • Awareness
  • Consideration
  • Purchase
  • Re Purchase (Retention and Reactivation) and which ones most impact your bottom line financials.

If you want to find out more about how Nepa can help your business, please get in touch.

Lindsay Cowan
Managing Director of Nepa UK

Blog Posts
Back

A study about the future of journalism

February 18, 2017

Robert Beatus


Share this article:


Introducing the voice of the consumer

The major media players in Sweden have developed the prerequisites for the future of journalism. As a result, nine focus areas are identified of which lead to research projects at Stockholm School of Economics (HHS).

Shown in the media:

Dagens Nyheter 1

Dagens Nyheter 2

Resumé

Dagens Media

Nepa conducted a study of the future of journalism where different data sources combine.

The basis of the analysis has been on consumers´ actual behavior within the largest news sites in Sweden as well as their inner motivations to news consumption. In addition, these studies were based on editorial content; unlike most other panel studies based on the ad business.

The analysis is based on digital behavior of 38,000 unique individuals. Specifically, these individuals are from Aftonbladet, Dagens Nyheter, Expressen, Svenska Dagbladet, Sveriges Radio, Sveriges Television, and Upsala Nya Tidning; in other words, Sweden’s largest news sites.

The digital footprint was supplemented with survey studies with 4,000 participants. Specifically, they were interviewed about six topics; media attitudes, news consumption, privacy, sharing behavior in social media, news commitment, and quality associations.

The nationally representative sample were aged from 15-74 years old and were drawn from the Nepa panels. These panels are consisting of approximately 350,000 consumers in Sweden.

READ ALSO: Brand research: What is it & why is it important?

The research projects will continuously measure behavior given the new realities of the outside world

Nepa introduced the voice of the consumer in the discussion on the basis of six consumer-related focus areas. These include:

  • News consumption in different segments
    • What are the different target segments?
    • Where do they consume the news today and what motivates them?
    • What are the needs of news and news formats they have today?
  • Viral behavior
    • What content can be shared with others?
    • What drives sharing in social media?
    • How is the shared content be perceived?
  • Commitment
    • What kind of commitment is there?
    • What drives commitment?
  • Quality associations digital media
    • What quality associations create a will to pay high perceived value in journalism?
  • The future news format
    • What are the future consumer needs of news and news formats?
  • Personal integrity
    • How does the perception of integrity differ among different segments of the target audience?
    • How does the need for integrity change over time?
    • In what way do different media brands affect consumers’ attitude?
    • How much information will different target groups want to share in the future? What will be their counterclaims?

Summary of the study

The market for news consumption is traditionally based on age, gender, or lifestyle. Therefore, by using consumers’ actual behavior and underlying driving forces, new segments for news consumption can be identified.

The new segments reveal three different groups whose needs are not being addressed today by traditional media. The three new segments satisfy their needs digitally with new types of media formats. In addition, these segments represent approximately 50% of the Swedish population.

However, the segments have different reasons for being active on social media. Some segments are using social media to influence the opinions of others. This is opposed to others whom use social media to enhance the image of themselves in their own network.

Furthermore, the study shows that there is a no one single way to attract the groups that are currently not addressed by traditional media. For example, there are consumers who question the independence of traditional media. While other consumers question the ability to focus on personalized and interactive content. Additionally, there are also consumers looking for more depth and context. Therefore, all these consumers feel that they can’t find this in traditional media.

READ ALSO: Optimize your marketing budget with Markting Mix Modeling

New consumer segments

The market for news consumption traditionally has been segmented based on age, gender or lifestyle. However, this may be because of the advertising market’s way of dividing consumers based on communicative audiences.

Therefore, to find new insights about consumers’ news consumption, the basis for segmentation focuses on the attitude and the drive of news consumption. Additionally, there is also a focus on the actual behavior of the news sites.

Six different segments identified are:

The Enthusiastic 15%

  • Large news commitment
  • Consumes news in all channels but prefers analog channels

The Traditional 13%

  • Has a high commitment to innovation and community
  • Consumes mainly traditional media in the analog channels

The Dutiful 18%

  • Consumes news because they feel they have to keep up
  • Appreciates objectivity

The Following 13%

  • Has a high commitment to news
  • Inspired by news
  • Follows others on social forums in search of news

The Social 20%

  • Is the least present on digital services of traditional media
  • Socially driven in their news consumption
  • Inspired by news

The Distrust 21%

  • Is less present at digital services of traditional media
  • Socially driven in their news consumption
  • Distrusts traditional media
  • Appreciates objectivity

News consumption among segments

Within three of the segments, traditional media has a specific challenge; the Social, the Following and the Distrust. These segments together constitute to 50% of the Swedish population. In addition, this specific population satisfies their needs more and more just by the use of digital media alternatives and new types of formats. Therefore, the population uses the traditional news sites less. However, this is because of the result of links from search engines or social media.

There are also interesting differences in how social media is being used between the segments that traditional media finds difficult to reach. These include:

  • The Social gladly share news in social media to build and maintain relationships. Therefore, strengthening their own brand by appearing intelligent.
  • The Following consume a lot of news digitally, much like the Social. However, they are not sharing news as much as them.
  • The Distrust are happy to share news in social media. However, it is mainly to show their position or convince others of their opinion.

READ ALSO: What is brand tracking and why is it important?

Perceived value for the quality associations

The study shows that there are multiple ways to attract the groups that are currently not addressed by traditional media. The three most traditional segments appreciates three things the most; the depth of sources, the engagement of opinion-journalism, and having more context than the other. This is something that the segments feel they get today.

Therefore, in order to attract the three segments, traditional media needs enhancements of characteristics within the following areas:

  • The Distrust – “exclusiveness and context”, “depth of sources and references”, and “professional journalists/co-workers”
  • The Social –  “exclusiveness and personalized content,” “content via audio and video”, and “useful in everyday life and work”
  • The Following – “supplementary content services and benefits” and “depth and context”

Thomas Berthelsen
Head of R&D at Nepa

Blog Posts
Back

Customers Decide What Goes – Building Towards Customer-centric Growth

February 15, 2017

Karen Chandler


Share this article:


Being customer-centric is vital

in an increasingly competitive and fast paced business environment. Most companies understand this and do their best to listen to – and understand – consumers and customers. But how do you get it to work all the way to tangible profitability at the point of action and transaction in your business?

Companies gather vast amounts of disparate data – purchase behaviour, survey results, not to mention all those digital footprints. No wonder big data has been the buzzword for quite some time now, and will continue to be so.

Frustrated by the ever increasing amount of data?

Massive databases are filled with potential knowledge about how to increase sales or how to develop and transform a business. The keyword here being “potential” and not so much “knowledge”.

The data in itself is quite useless unless you extract meaning from it and take appropriate action based on insights. The ongoing digitalization has exponentially increased the amount of data available to companies but making data-driven decisions is lagging behind. For companies, it is difficult to extract meaningful insights from the vast amount of data generated from multiple sources.

“Companies become more customer-centric by using their loyalty club as co-creation engines – fuelled by big data.”

Companies are frustrated because big data holds a lot of promise but simply gathering the data doesn’t lead to customer-centricity. Instead of starting with and focusing on the vast amounts of data at hand, business leaders must take a step back and evaluate what business issues they aim to solve.

The voice of the customer is a very strong voice

Yet it´s more of a sniper rifle than a shotgun. Customer opinions and behavior are totally dependent on context and is taken into account when designing a solution. Specifically, a solution that aims to inject the voice of the customer into company processes and operations is vital for success.

READ ALSO: Brand research: What is it & why is it important?

Let’s explore how a large grocery chain in the Nordics, improved their retail store operations and became more customer centric by utilizing a forgotten asset – their loyalty club. The company suffered declining market shares at a steady rate over several years. The average consumer’s view of the company was that it was badly managed (although good natured and considerate) grocery retailer compared to competitors. Consumer associations to the company brand included old fashioned, expensive and even uninspiring.

“The consumer insight department was staffed entirely with people from outside the organisation and had a fairly free role.”

How to unlock the power of the customers’ engagement

A number of re-organisation initiatives and re-engineering projects were undertaken over the years without changing the negative trend. In a drastic attempt to make the company more market oriented and customer-centric, they formed a new business unit. The new unit was set up as an independent entity within the company. It also included old functions such as brand, communication and CRM, as well as a few new functions. One such new team was the consumer insight department. The department was staffed entirely with people from outside the organisation and had a fairly free role.

The new team began exploring the consumer’s perspective on the company and what assets the company had for insight generation. They found two things:

  1. The amount of data the company had about customers and transactions was endless and despite the downward trend,
  2. the company had not lost the engagement of their core customers.

The company asked Nepa – the Consumer Science company – to help them try to harness those two assets. The overall objective given to Nepa was clear: unlock the power of the customers’ engagement and their data in order to involve them in the re-design of the company into a modern retailer.

Nepa did not make the mistake of focusing on data rather than key business issues. Instead, Nepa and the company agreed that the first business problem was to improve the store operations.

READ ALSO: Benefits of Path to Purchase analysis

The first 3 vital steps

As the consumers found the company somewhat old fashioned and uninspiring we decided to:

  1. Get more actionable insights from customers about possible improvements in the store environments and operations.
  2. Gather relevant data and make it actionable for over 650 stores.
  3. Deploy its solution for trigger based research by utilizing the Nepa Consumer Science platform®.

As previously mentioned, the company had an amazing asset in the engagement among their core customers. And they had a lot of them – The company’s loyalty club included more than 3 million members at the time. In order to make these numbers more manageable, Nepa invited the company’s members to join a smaller co-creation engine inside the club. Members were quite eager to join and soon the number of members in the co-creation engine was over 40 000.

Analyzing and visualizing details are key factors

The key feature of the Nepa Consumer Science platform® is having one customer-ID on each panellist – allowing attribution of any type of data to each individual. This allows Nepa to combine behavioral big data with attitudinal data – enabling trigger-based research using big data.

Every time a member of the co-creation engine shopped at a company store, personalized research can be triggered. The research is based on store visits and buying behavior. The company didn’t have to ask if a customer went to the bread section of a specific store in for example Stockholm. Before asking any questions , the customers already knew exactly what baked goods had been bought, when and where.

A continuous stream of development opportunities

To date the co-creation engine has:

  1. Combined 2 billion lines of sales data with over 8 million points of direct customer feedback.
  2. Packaged the data into over 2500 automated reports during a year.
  3. Delivered the reports to over 600 stores each quarter.

“The introduction of the Nepa Consumer Science platform® tailored the feedback to each retail outlet.”

The format and delivery of these reports is key. It keeps insights actionable and not overwhelming the receiver with information and data.

Prior to the implantation of the Nepa Consumer Science platform® the company had general reports available on a regional level – regional managers where responsible for disseminating insights to individual store owners. The feedback wasn’t tailored to each retail outlet which was the problem. The introduction of the Nepa Consumer Science platform® changed this. A short 3-page report detailing key improvement areas in an importance/performance matrix, how the store was faring per department, and performance compared to local competitors and other company stores provided store managers with a clear guide as to what was working in-store and what wasn’t.

The financial impact – catching the eyes of store managers

Coupling sales data to the trigger-based research, the findings and recommended actions was translated into financial impact. For example, a certain level of satisfaction within the produce section is assigned an economic value based on the performance of the company’s stores. We can estimate the economic value of implementing changes suggested by customers and increasing the particular store’s satisfaction within that department.

This meant a greatly increased interest for the reports among store managers. The reports are hanging in the staff rooms of the company stores all over the country. This enables a localized data driven approach to store operations.

READ ALSO: Brand tracking is key to increase brand awareness

The voice of the customer is helping redesign the company

So far, a little over 180 000 customers have engaged in the initiative and have provided store managers with almost 250 000 suggestions, comments and ideas. Most of them are very specific and valuable to the local manager; some of them being complaints and comments regarding price. The average customer experience with the company has improved markedly since the start of the initiative.

In addition to evaluating store operations on a continuous basis – the co-creation engine also allows for extremely cost-effective ad-hoc research. Even though the company has very limited resources in the insight department (only 5 FTEs), they still manage to turn around over 120 ad hoc research projects per year.

The co-creation engine has been vital in redesigning the company and improving their operations. The company has harnessed the power of their engaged customers and the co-creation engine in Nepa Consumer Science platform® enjoys an extremely high response rate, over 50% with no signs of dropping.

“The company became much more customer-centric in their local operations by tapping an incredibly valuable asset – their own loyalty club.”

Beyond CRM – business growth triggered by consumers

To further leverage this quick feedback loop, Nepa built a digital live feedback tool for the company’s headquarters. Digital screens display a map of the country and populate it with customer feedback from different stores across the country – in real time. This is extremely valued by management who are already using the KPIs from the Nepa Consumer Science platform® as some of the main governing tools for the entire company.

The company became much more customer-centric in their local operations by tapping an incredibly valuable asset – their own loyalty club. Many companies today are underutilizing this asset and merely engaging in traditional CRM activities. It’s time for these companies to stop being confused by large data sets, look beyond CRM as a solution to customer-centricity and couple behavioral and survey data to build co-creation engines.

We help businesses to thrive with customer-centricity by utilizing the power of continuous consumer insights. There is no end to what you can achieve with real-time consumer insights, customer feedback and footprints. It changes the way your business engage with customers.

Please do get in touch if you’d like to find out more.

Lindsay Cowan
Managing Director of Nepa UK

Blog Posts
Back

Get personal and monetize your customer data

February 12, 2017

Sam Richardson


Share this article:


Zoom in on the individual consumer

A consumer centric approach is not just a passing fad that we all use for a while and then disregard; like that Tamagotchi digital pet you swore to keep alive. It is an absolute necessity for all modern companies. But what does it actually involve? To summarize, it’s one of the best ways of monetizing your customer data by zooming in on the individual consumer.

In this connected world, consumers are bombarded by a vast array of information and choices. If you want to break through that with your message, you must understand the consumer’s desires. You must get personal on an individual level to gain and keep their trust. Marketing today is more complex than ever before. However, our tools at Nepa have evolved with the times. The companies that apply consumer-centric strategies will have plenty to gain. The companies that don’t must beware of the hungry competitors waiting to swoop in and steal their customers with just the click of a mouse.

“Data is the friendship-link between your company and that individual from New York (or Stockholm) that just ordered your product.”

Get to know your consumers and gain their trust

Data is the first building block towards a consumer centric approach. Ensuring the collection of data and understanding of customer behavior from the start of the consumer purchasing path will help you discover the vital trigger that determine why consumers act on your offer and vice versa. However, you will need even more data variables to fully understand what actually makes a consumer buy from you and also become a repeat customer. Data is the friendship-link between your company and that individual from New York (or Stockholm) that just ordered your product. Data can be collected using methods such as scripts, forms, observational techniques, and classic market research; all of which we support at Nepa.

READ ALSO: What is brand tracking and why is it important?

Customer data in itself is useless if you don’t put the 1s and 0s into action

My experience reveals that these mountains of data often become overwhelming. Therefore not surprisingly, most companies need help to get started and also need help to keep the momentum going. This is an ongoing process that grows in value the more you work with it. A lot of energy is often fueled very early into the project of data collection. This leaves very little for when you need it the most; specifically at the analysis stage. That is why we at Nepa like to take a long-term approach and evolve with you and your consumers, always staying one step ahead of your competitors.

Dashboards and action plans – tools to engage your entire organization

Your data needs to be filtered, sorted, and ranked according to importance. In addition, the data needs to be summarized into segments and the findings need to be visualized so they become easier to understand.

“In front of you lays a consumer centric action plan, upon which your decisions and your next best actions will be made – throughout your organization.”

Many companies halt at this stage; thinking that the job is done. But they are actually missing out on the crucial analysis phase. You must also consider the data in the context of what you are trying to achieve; uncovering trends, relationships, and reasons to continuously act within all those data sets. Once the analysis is complete, you will feel the presence of your customers. In front of you lays a consumer centric action plan, upon which your decisions and your next best actions will be made – throughout your organization.

For instance, lets say your customers turn out to be male joggers who also like highly educated women that love all sports. Finding the triggers that will make them buy their next pair of sport shoes from your company (and not your competitor) is crucial. To do this effectively, you need to implement consumer centric strategies. This will make your customers feel that you are talking to them and not a mesh of target groups bundled into one.

READ ALSO: Power-up your marketing mix with brand expertise and data science

Using a holistic approach; no bits and pieces left behind

Many companies hire someone to find the “big data”. Then additionally hire someone else to provide the necessary analysis, insights, and actions. This leaves these companies with an abundance of information, often stored in silos, but with no real strategy on how to actually implement it. Therefore, the abundance of information is not helpful. It can get more complicated when you consider how all of that information is intended to be used; whether it is your marketing, sales, product development, or product placement in stores.

“We believe in a holistic approach, taking into consideration all of the factors that eventually determine your success in the marketplace.”

There is no universal template for gathering and analyzing consumer data. Since most companies don’t work through this problem at outset, many end up with disappointing results. That is why at Nepa, we believe in a holistic approach. We take all of the factors into consideration that will eventually determine your success in the marketplace.

Just having relevant customer information alone is worthless

Unless you are able to use it to take effective action based on the data; but not just any action. Actions bring you financial rewards; whether it’s earnings from new sales, developing new products, or simply keeping your existing customers far away from your competitors. This can be enough to make even the savviest CEO worry.

What if there was someone who could actually guide you the entire way?

  1. Through the customer path to purchase
  2. Through the process of combining and analyzing feedback and behavioral data
  3. Deciding upon your continuously updated consumer insights
  4. With daily actions no matter where in your organization the potential for improvement is pointing
  5. With having the result addressing your own KPI´s
  6. By automating the entire process to ensure your growth opportunities never stops.

This is what Nepa, and our  Nepa Consumer Science Platform®, is all about. Real-time optimization based on continuous consumer insights, customer feedback, and footprints.  All this with a single goal – to improve customer experiences and ultimately your financial results throughout your organization.

In this post I have only scratched the surface. To become a true customer-centric business, there is of course a number of tricky tech issues, complex analysis, specific understanding of your business, and more to consider. This is our area of expertise at Nepa. So, why not get in touch with me and I promise to get you started.

Ola Bergfeldt
Head of Global Communications at Nepa